docs: R-305 addendum — nine, now by inspection rather than assertion

R-305 asserted the shared seven were all genuine without opening them, which is
the error the entry exists to correct, committed inside the correction. Opened
all nine: every cell cited, none prose, every column mixing bold with plain.

The peer's final count of eight is their own vocabulary's nine minus the false
positive, an arithmetic that never contained 'Then wipes' because wiped? cannot
match wipes. The union was agreed and their own set was counted.

Nothing in the design turns on it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
slaguru666
2026-09-13 20:18:49 +01:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent c59dc45117
commit 4df8064559
+31
View File
@@ -7570,3 +7570,34 @@ was both the subject and the ruler — and produced 44%, 57% and 64% in turn, no
about the documents. The recovery is not to retreat to what both instruments agree on. **It is
to open the disputed cases and look**, which is what distinguishes a real gap from noise, and
which no amount of comparing totals can do.
### R-305 addendum — nine, now by inspection rather than assertion
**R-305 asserted the shared seven were "all genuine" without opening them**, which is the
error this very entry was written to correct, committed inside the correction. Opened now —
every column, every cell, markers intact:
```
1119 "Wiped" n=9 all cited **0%** 0% 0% 0% **0%** 0.1% **15.2%** **90.8%** 100%
1119 "Median rounds" n=9 all cited **2** 2 2 6 **13** 5 **14** **13** 7
1143 "Wiped" n=4 all cited 0% **8.3%** **30.1%** 93.8%
1143 "Median rounds" n=4 all cited 13 **21** **25** 16
1198 "Wiped" n=5 all cited 0.5% **74.9%** **100%** 45.3% 99.8%
1234 "Then wipes" n=2 all cited **25.5%** 7.8%
1301 "Median" n=2 all cited 10.7 **14**
1301 "Past 15 rounds" n=2 all cited 19.9% **40.3%**
1301 "1 in 100 runs past" n=2 all cited 32.3 rounds **45.3** rounds
```
**Every cell carries a citation, none is prose, and every column mixes bold with plain.** Nine
stands, and now for a reason.
**The concurrent session's final count of eight is one short, and the missing column is the one
they had just conceded.** Their eight is their own vocabulary's nine minus the single false
positive — an arithmetic that never contained *"Then wipes"*, because `wiped?` cannot match
*wipes*. **It is the union that was agreed and their own set that was counted.** Which is the
evening's lesson once more and at the smallest possible scale: the instrument was still in the
answer.
**Nothing in the design turns on it.** Seven, eight or nine, bold is unreliable inside tables,
and the four-row reading of the mixed-force table settles the merge on its own.