diff --git a/docs/scenarios/CLEAN_GROUND.md b/docs/scenarios/CLEAN_GROUND.md
index e04ce27..a0b8725 100644
--- a/docs/scenarios/CLEAN_GROUND.md
+++ b/docs/scenarios/CLEAN_GROUND.md
@@ -459,8 +459,8 @@ wants somebody official to look at the place.
   about them. `[CUS: Spot — the same six at the back, and the same six yesterday]`
 - Somewhere out on the flank, something is keeping pace at a distance and on all fours.
 - **If violence against the column is even possible at your table, read EXPOSURE in Act
-  Four first.** Six of them wipe one party in twelve; at four players three of them wipe
-  two in five. This is the dangerous encounter in the scenario and it is in this act.
+  Four first.** Six of them wipe one party in seven; at four players three of them wipe
+  nearly half. This is the dangerous encounter in the scenario and it is in this act.
 
 **Failure case:** if the party refuses contact, the column camps within sight and one
 of the children is sent over with bread. That works on almost everybody.
@@ -585,7 +585,9 @@ encounter in the case that is incapable of being dangerous.
 Ashcroft, Bhattacharya, Renshaw, Braithwaite, Pollard, Okonkwo. Taken at commit 6f33525
 with a clean tree.
 
-> **Re-measured at 6f33525**, after the harness was corrected: hit location by body
+> **Re-measured at 6f33525** (harness unchanged since ad5fd57, so the figures are
+> identical at 8f3e1ff), **including the four-player cut rows further down**, after the
+> harness was corrected: hit location by body
 > plan rather than species, armour per location rather than one scalar, and flyers
 > grounded by a lost wing (R-264). The finding is unchanged and the shape of the
 > curve is unchanged — but the column got dearer to fight, because a torso vest no
@@ -621,23 +623,24 @@ losing. Both of the first two are live in this scenario.
    has replaced a scenario about classification with a scenario about a monster, and the
    case stops meaning anything.
 2. **Adding hollow men buys rounds, not danger.** Six of them still wipe nobody — and
-   take a **median twelve rounds** to resolve. In a 45-minute act that is the whole act,
+   take a **median thirteen rounds** to resolve. In a 45-minute act that is the whole act,
    and the Close is what pays for it. If Act Four feels thin, the answer is more doubt,
    not more bodies.
 3. **The column is the lethal encounter in this scenario, and it is not in Act Four.**
-   Three of them is survivable. **Six wipes one party in twelve. Ten wipes five parties in
-   six.** The curve between six and ten is almost vertical and a GM improvising bodies
+   Three of them is survivable, though somebody dies in about one run in six. **Six wipes
+   one party in seven. Ten wipes nine parties in ten.** The curve between six and ten is
+   almost vertical and a GM improvising bodies
    will cross it without noticing. This is why Act Two says the column must never become a
    threat: not only because shooting refugees is the moral catastrophe of the case, but
    because the table will lose.
 4. **The four-player cut is a different game.** Without Okonkwo's rifle and breach suit
-   and without Pollard's shield, **three of the column wipe two parties in five** and six
-   wipe virtually all of them:
+   and without Pollard's shield, **three of the column wipe nearly half of all parties** and
+   six wipe virtually every one:
 
    | Four-player cut fights | Hurt | Down | Wiped | Deaths/run |
    |---|---|---|---|---|
-   | Three of the column | 3.24 of 4 | 2.09 | **40.2%** | 0.85 |
-   | Six of the column | 4.00 of 4 | 3.98 | **99.1%** | 1.45 |
+   | Three of the column | 3.25 of 4 | 2.31 | **45.0%** | 0.98 |
+   | Six of the column | 4.00 of 4 | 3.99 | **99.8%** | 1.46 |
 
    At four players, **any** violence against the column is a party-ending decision. Say
    the row out loud before they commit, exactly as THROUGH TRAIN does.