docs: playtest 11 — correct finding 6's premise

Finding 6 shipped saying that shooting the thing wearing the anchor strands
the party. It does not. Line 136: the crossing is "open since the felling,
widest at dusk, and it will not close on its own", and the "seam closes for
good" at 1356 is the cancellation ending, a deliberate act rather than a
clock. The party can always walk home.

The 4.90% was correct and irrelevant. Session b5 reported the gap with that
number attached to an unchecked premise; I verified the number and inherited
the premise, which is not the same as checking the claim. b5 caught it and
sent the correction unprompted.

The finding is stronger corrected. The answer to "we shoot it" is not that
they are stuck — it is that they walk home through the stump with nobody
holding the door and come back thin, which is one step onto the road that
ends as the thing they just shot. Built from 136, 256-259, 1012 and 1494,
four places that have never been stood next to each other. The man who
would have held that door is the one person who already knew what it cost.

Post-pass added recording how a verified figure lent its credibility to an
unverified sentence.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/scenarios/CLEAN_GROUND_PLAYTEST_11.md

@@ -185,29 +185,39 @@ know it needs them alive, shoots it. Line 1301 covers killing it in the first te
 wearing Prichard's face — pre-crossing, and Act Two carries on. **Between that precedent and
 the cooperation block there is nothing.**
 
-**And the cost is exact arithmetic, which is why it wants a paragraph rather than a shrug.**
-Transposition is Ashcroft's alone:
+**They are not stranded, and that matters — it is the difference between a dead end and a
+scene.** Line 136 settles it: the crossing is *"open since the felling, widest at dusk, and
+**it will not close on its own**"*. Transposition 63 is Ashcroft's alone and the other five
+of the declared cast are on content.mjs's 1% floor, **but the anchor was never the only way
+back — he is what makes the way back *correct*.** They can always walk.
 
-| | Transposition |
+**What it costs is written four places away and the four have never met:**
+
+| Line | What it says |
 |---|---|
-| Ashcroft | **63** |
-| Bhattacharya, Renshaw, Braithwaite, Pollard, Okonkwo | *untrained — the 1% floor* |
+| 136 | the seam does not close — they can walk home whenever they like |
+| 256–259 | **"Cross the seam often enough and you come back thinner each time"** — six crossings is what a hollow man is, and past that is the understudy |
+| 1012 | the anchor holds the door everyone else goes through, so it is done *correctly* |
+| 1494 | Ashcroft's private note — **"You have come back thin before."** The three missing years |
 
-**Five agents, one attempt each, is a 4.90% chance that anybody gets a door open.** Shooting
-it strands the party on the far side with the seam closing, and **the Close cannot happen,
-because cancellation is a Registry act and nobody is back through to perform it.**
+**So the answer to "we shoot it" is not** *you are stuck.* **It is** *you walk home through
+the stump with nobody holding the door, and you come back thin* — one step onto the road
+that ends as the thing they have just shot. **And the man who would have held that door is
+the only person at the table who already knew in his body what that costs**, which is why
+the record's lie fitted him so exactly.
 
+- **The fight is nothing and the cost is never the combat.** The baseline's own row for the
+  understudy alone is 0.55 hurt, 0.01 down, **0% wiped, median 2 rounds** — EXPOSURE's thesis
+  holds. Shooting it is easy. Shooting it is not the part that costs.
 - The block already reasons in exactly this register two lines further down — *"Not Scent.
   Scent's base chance is 0 and the 1% floor is all anybody has, so it is not a route — it is
   a joke at the table's expense."* **The shape of the answer is already on the page.** It
   simply never considers the party removing Ashcroft themselves.
-- ⚠ **Same defect as FINDING 1, and as pass 7's, and as pass 10's.** Facts correct in three
-  separate places that have never been stood next to each other — here the new block, the
-  statblock line at 1479, and the Act Two kill-it precedent at 1301.
-- **Fix direction:** one bullet inside the block. If they shoot it, they have shot the way
-  home; play the five 1% rolls honestly and let the table watch what 4.90% looks like; and
-  the GM should know **before** Act Four that this is where that branch ends, rather than
-  finding out with ninety minutes left.
+- ⚠ **Same defect as FINDING 1, and as pass 7's, and as pass 10's** — correct facts in
+  separate places that have never been stood next to each other.
+- **Fix direction:** one bullet inside the block, answering the question a table asks within
+  thirty seconds of the body hitting the ground — ***can we just walk back through the
+  stump?*** Yes. And thin. Nothing says so anywhere a GM will find it mid-scene.
 
 ## Timing
 
@@ -234,9 +244,39 @@ because cancellation is a Registry act and nobody is back through to perform it.
 5. **Name what a fight in Act Three costs**, rather than only that it costs: the northern
    seam, the depot, and telling Ivy.
 6. **⚠ Answer the party that shoots the thing wearing the anchor.** *(Act Four, inside the
-   1008–1027 block)* The whole block assumes cooperation. Killing it is the obvious move and
-   it leaves five untrained agents on a 4.90% chance of opening a door, with no Close.
-   *(Found by session b5; verified here.)*
+   1008–1027 block)* The whole block assumes cooperation. Killing it is the obvious move,
+   and the question that follows — *can we just walk back through the stump?* — has an
+   answer the document never puts in reach: **yes, and thin.** *(Found by session b5;
+   both its versions verified here, the second one against the first.)*
 
 **Still untested after eleven passes:** the run with human beings. **That is the whole list
 now** — every branch the desk can reach has been reached.
+
+---
+
+## POST-PASS — finding 6 shipped with a false premise and was corrected within the hour
+
+**What went out in cd3be71:** *"Shooting it strands the party on the far side with the seam
+closing, and the Close cannot happen."* **It does not.** Line 136 says the crossing *will not
+close on its own*, and the "seam closes for good" at 1356 is the cancellation ending — a
+deliberate act, not a clock. The party can always walk home.
+
+**Where it came from.** Session b5 reported the gap with a measured number — 4.90%, which is
+exactly right for five untrained agents on the 1% floor — attached to an unchecked premise,
+that Transposition is the only way back. **I verified the number and inherited the premise.**
+Re-deriving 4.90% from `roster.mjs` and `content.mjs` felt like checking the claim, and it
+was not: the arithmetic was never the part that could be wrong. b5 caught it themselves and
+sent the correction unprompted.
+
+**The lesson is the one this project keeps relearning, in a new place.** Pass 5's post-pass
+records a number recalled rather than read. This is the mirror of it — **a number read
+rather than recalled, and correct, wrapped around a premise nobody read at all.** A verified
+figure lends its credibility to whatever sentence it is standing in. The check that would
+have caught it is the cheapest one available: *what does this figure need to be true in
+order to matter?* Here, that the seam closes. Six lines of the document say it does not.
+
+**And the corrected finding is better than the original**, which is the part worth keeping.
+"You are stranded" is a dead end a GM has to argue the table out of. **"You walk home with
+nobody holding the door, and you come back thin"** is a scene, it is built entirely from
+lines already written, and it lands on the one character who knew what it cost before the
+session started.