From e84c85be029f69e2e0fea88c5a50a2522a666841 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: slaguru666 <111923774+slaguru666@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 01:17:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] R-265: name the denominator the two-down row is zero out of MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The round-five race line read "zero in 2000 fights", which invites the reading that no fight in the run was a wipe. It is zero out of the 84 that reach round five with two of the three down — a small bucket, and the sentence should say so before the figure goes to print in a scenario. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 --- docs/REVIEW_LOG.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/REVIEW_LOG.md b/docs/REVIEW_LOG.md index 5eb1397..07b0788 100644 --- a/docs/REVIEW_LOG.md +++ b/docs/REVIEW_LOG.md @@ -5803,8 +5803,8 @@ three of the column is bimodal: 23.1% of fights end with nobody down, 45.0% with down, and 11% land on the published mean of 2.31. Six players against six of the column is not bimodal at all — 10 to 18% at every outcome — so this is a property of the cut rather than of the creature. The mechanism is a race: put one of the three down inside five rounds -and the wipe rate falls from 58.5% to 19.7%; put down two and it is zero in 2000 fights. -68% of fights reach round five with none of them down. +and the wipe rate falls from 58.5% to 19.7%; put down two and it is zero wipes in the 84 +fights that get there. 68% of fights reach round five with none of them down. **The lesson is the one this log keeps recording, one layer out.** A number that cannot be reproduced is a claim, whoever holds it. It was caught because another session tried the