Found while setting up pass 5 by pulling the sheets from roster.mjs instead of
recalling them. The d100s are unchanged; only what they were compared against
was wrong, and three outcomes flip:
Pollard Spot, the stump 58 -> 53 success becomes fail
Bhattacharya Anomaly Lore 58 -> 63 FUMBLE becomes plain failure
Braithwaite Xenology (Baseline) 45 -> 53 fail becomes success
So three things pass 4 reported did not happen. The re-cut-the-peg fumble never
fired -- 98 against 63 is a plain failure, 96-99 never succeed -- which means
the ten-minute chase and the whole of finding 2 rest on a roll the seed did not
produce. Braithwaite's Xenology succeeded, so the scenario's one
single-point-of-failure remains untested after five passes rather than having
'finally come up in play'. And Pollard missed the stump.
Read correctly, the same seed lands near 3:34 -- six minutes UNDER budget
rather than six over.
Findings 1, 3 and 5 are untouched: the special was a real 7, the Swinburne
fumble a real 00, and THE OFFER's staging is not a dice question. Finding 2's
conclusion also survives because it never depended on the roll -- Act Three is
budgeted at 50, the text predicts the fumble costs 20, and nothing connected
that to the cut. The reasoning was right and the evidence was invented, and the
scenario now says so instead of citing a playtest that did not happen.
The Pacing Note's slack claim is withdrawn rather than replaced. One seed read
two ways gave 3:46 and 3:34, and the gap between them is about the size of the
margin being argued over. It now tells a GM the shape -- every scene has
something that ends it, the cuts are real, Act Three is the likeliest overrun --
rather than a number a desk pass cannot produce.
npm run check: 17 guards, exit 0.
slaguru666
ae06df8e04