One generator, so a citation names one fight (R-265)
tools/playthrough.mjs exists to show a reader why a measured number is what it is. I cited it to another session — read seed 2, see the wipe the 45% row is made of — and the reproduction failed in front of them. They reported different outcomes at both seeds and guessed the cause correctly from outside: the two tools were not drawing from the same stream. They were not. simulate.mjs used a private mulberry32 makeRng; playthrough.mjs had its own LCG written to look like it. Both deterministic, both reproducible alone, and "seed 2" named a different fight in each — which breaks the only thing the tool is for. Its own comment claimed a seed here names the same fight there. check-focus carried a third copy of that LCG, so the two guards described the same game with different dice. makeRng is exported and both files use it. A playthrough seed is now exactly the first fight of simulate.mjs --seed <n>: --runs 1 --seed 2 and the playthrough give 9 rounds, 4 of 4 down, 1 dead, both. The other half was my citation rather than the code: the command I sent omitted --mode, so it plays both targeting arms and prints two fights. They read the last line, I quoted the first. The summary line now names the arm. check-focus re-recorded under the shared stream; figures move a point or two. What it buys is that the bimodality analysis now reproduces the published means exactly — 2.31, 3.03, 0.40, 0.42 against the four rows CLEAN GROUND publishes. Under the old LCG it agreed to within a decimal, which looked like corroboration and was two experiments landing near each other. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
796bb7df73
commit
8627fa3536
@@ -187,12 +187,12 @@ check-kits: OK — 25 roles, 10 trades, 218 catalogue items, every kit key resol
|
||||
check-lang: OK — en.json, 1018 keys, no leaf/branch collisions
|
||||
check-templates: OK — 19 templates compile
|
||||
check-behaviour: OK — 76 behavioural tests
|
||||
check-scenarios: OK — 12 scenario files, 79 mechanic tags, every skill named resolves against 62 catalogue entries
|
||||
check-rollable: OK — 78 rolls across 12 scenario files, every one reachable at 25% or better by somebody present
|
||||
check-scenarios: OK — 13 scenario files, 80 mechanic tags, every skill named resolves against 62 catalogue entries
|
||||
check-rollable: OK — 79 rolls across 13 scenario files, every one reachable at 25% or better by somebody present
|
||||
check-creatures: OK — 102 actor specs across 8 sources, every characteristic, skill, kit key, talent, species and style resolves, no duplicate keys
|
||||
check-anatomy: OK — 5 body plans, 36 locations, d20 complete in both modes, every location drawn, every kind handled and destructible, 20 plan changes carried 432 wounds with their severity intact, 1 flyer(s) with a survivable landing
|
||||
check-lethality: OK — 47 creatures, every one fighting exactly as recorded against the frozen party
|
||||
check-focus: OK — focus fire measured against 30 packs, helps in all of them, 28 of them by more than their own noise
|
||||
check-focus: OK — focus fire measured against 31 packs, helps in all of them, 31 of them by more than their own noise
|
||||
check-bestiary: OK — 47 creatures, the document matches the game
|
||||
```
|
||||
<!-- guards:end -->
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user